New Conflicting Shadow Daemon Information
First, a quick apology for making late additions to the site. An explanation has been posted in the off-topic news area.
If you’ve read the off-topic news then you’re aware that I was speaking with a psychologist on unrelated issues. What I didn’t mention in that update is that this fellow possibly seemed open to the existence of spirits of some sort. It has crossed my mind to ask him if he could perform regressive hypnosis specifically for this topic. The issue of possible costs deters me from doing so.
—CLIPPED—
I have positively no memory what so ever of a second experience with a shadow being of any type at that specific location, yet Phil’s information adds a twist to everything.
This goes to show that the memory - which I’m now fairly sure was altered becuse of how frightening the experience was for me - is possibly more fractured than I previously thought.
The same pal whom I mention in my previous update on the “Shadow Daemon” experience has explained to me that he has spoken with Phil, the third individual involved in my original retelling.
He explained to my pal - whom wishes to remain anonymous - that there were actually TWO shadow creature experiences on the front porch of that house.
I have positively no memory what so ever of a second experience with a shadow being of any type at that specific location, yet Phil’s information, if it can be trusted, adds a twist to everything. He has informed us that both experiences, as described in my original retelling as well as in the Shadow Daemon update, occurred.
According to Phil these experiences differ by small variations from what is posted on Shadows In Motion. More information on these differences will be posted in a week or two, or as soon as I can better clearify them. I want the best info possible posted here.
If this new information is true then that means that not only is my memory of the event altered but there is a chance that my pal’s could be altered as well. This situation grows more interesting with every bit of information that’s regained - did he experience something, too, and just not remember it?
Ah, but the catch? Phil is now very, very religious and he has in the past exaggerated or otherwise created stories for one reason or another.
I haven’t had a serious conversation with him for years. Has he changed? Or is his information still questionable? I don’t know, and since I have no desire to be backed into a biblical “lesson” from him there is little chance that I’ll ask him about it myself. I have no choice but to allow this information to hang inconclusively for now.
~Mysk
Topics: Other Oddities |
Comments are closed.